Attitude Towards Use of Social Media for Medical Education and Professional Networking

Main Article Content

Samyra Garg, Shreyashi Sarkar, Amrish Choudhary, Aman Chandija, Ankur Sharma, Hemant Kumar Garg, Brij Mohan

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms are increasingly used for medical education and professional networking. Understanding attitudes across health professional trainees and staff can guide formal educational strategies and policy.


Objective: To evaluate attitudes toward use of social media for medical education and professional networking among MBBS students/interns, nursing students, and paramedical staff.


Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 250 participants (100 MBBS students/interns, 50 nursing students, 100 paramedical staff). A structured questionnaire captured demographics, platform usage, purposes (education, networking, patient education, personal use), perceived benefits and risks, professionalism concerns, and preferred institutional policies. Primary outcomes: proportion reporting social media use for medical education and for professional networking; mean attitude scores (5-point Likert) for perceived usefulness, trustworthiness, and professionalism risk. Statistical tests: chi-square for categorical comparisons, ANOVA/Kruskal-Wallis for Likert scores, and logistic regression adjusting for age, role, and prior formal training.


Results: (Illustrative simulated example — clearly labeled) Among 250 respondents, 80% reported using social media daily, 68% used it for medical education, and 45% used it for professional networking. MBBS students/interns reported higher educational use (78%) compared with nursing students (66%) and paramedical staff (58%). Mean perceived usefulness score for education was 3.9/5 (SD 0.8). Major concerns were misinformation (74%) and breach of patient confidentiality (61%). A majority (67%) supported institutional guidance/training on professional social media use.


Conclusions: Social media is widely used among health trainees and staff for educational purposes; however, concerns about misinformation and professionalism persist. Institutional training and clear policies are recommended to harness benefits while reducing risks.

Article Details

Section
Articles